Design Buy Build

Main Menu

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Rates & Data
    • Media Pack
  • Digital
    • Information
    • Latest Newsletter
  • Issues
    • 2025
      • Issue 76
      • Issue 75
      • Issue 74
      • Issue 73
      • Issue 72
    • 2024
      • Issue 71
      • Issue 70
      • Issue 69
      • Issue 68
      • Issue 67
      • Issue 66
    • 2023
      • Issue 65
      • Issue 64
      • Issue 63
      • Issue 62
      • Issue 61
      • Issue 60
    • 2022
      • Issue 59
      • Issue 58
      • Issue 57
      • Issue 56
      • Issue 55
      • Issue 54
    • 2021
      • Issue 53
      • Issue 52
      • Issue 51
      • Issue 50
      • Issue 49
      • Issue 48
    • 2020
      • Issue 47
      • Issue 46
      • Issue 45
      • Issue 44
      • Issue 43
      • Issue 42
    • 2019
      • Issue 41
      • Issue 40
      • Issue 39
      • Issue 38
      • Issue 37
      • Issue 36
    • 2018
      • Issue 35
      • Issue 34
      • Issue 33
      • Issue 32
      • Issue 31
      • Issue 30
    • 2017
      • Issue 29
      • Issue 28
      • Issue 27
      • Issue 26
      • Issue 25
      • Issue 24
    • 2016
      • Issue 23
      • Issue 22
      • Issue 21
      • Issue 20
      • Issue 19
      • Issue 18
    • 2015
      • Issue 17
      • Issue 16
      • Issue 15
      • Issue 14
      • Issue 13
      • Issue 12
    • 2014
      • Issue 11
      • Issue 10
      • Issue 9
      • Issue 8
      • Issue 7
    • 2013
      • Issue 6
      • Issue 5
      • Issue 4
      • Issue 3
      • Issue 2
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
Sign in / Join

Login

Welcome! Login in to your account
Lost your password?

Lost Password

Back to login

logo

Design Buy Build

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Rates & Data
    • Media Pack
  • Digital
    • Information
    • Latest Newsletter
  • Issues
    • 2025
      • Issue 76
      • Issue 75
      • Issue 74
      • Issue 73
      • Issue 72
    • 2024
      • Issue 71
      • Issue 70
      • Issue 69
      • Issue 68
      • Issue 67
      • Issue 66
    • 2023
      • Issue 65
      • Issue 64
      • Issue 63
      • Issue 62
      • Issue 61
      • Issue 60
    • 2022
      • Issue 59
      • Issue 58
      • Issue 57
      • Issue 56
      • Issue 55
      • Issue 54
    • 2021
      • Issue 53
      • Issue 52
      • Issue 51
      • Issue 50
      • Issue 49
      • Issue 48
    • 2020
      • Issue 47
      • Issue 46
      • Issue 45
      • Issue 44
      • Issue 43
      • Issue 42
    • 2019
      • Issue 41
      • Issue 40
      • Issue 39
      • Issue 38
      • Issue 37
      • Issue 36
    • 2018
      • Issue 35
      • Issue 34
      • Issue 33
      • Issue 32
      • Issue 31
      • Issue 30
    • 2017
      • Issue 29
      • Issue 28
      • Issue 27
      • Issue 26
      • Issue 25
      • Issue 24
    • 2016
      • Issue 23
      • Issue 22
      • Issue 21
      • Issue 20
      • Issue 19
      • Issue 18
    • 2015
      • Issue 17
      • Issue 16
      • Issue 15
      • Issue 14
      • Issue 13
      • Issue 12
    • 2014
      • Issue 11
      • Issue 10
      • Issue 9
      • Issue 8
      • Issue 7
    • 2013
      • Issue 6
      • Issue 5
      • Issue 4
      • Issue 3
      • Issue 2
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
Latest News
Home›Latest News›Cellecta is urging architects, developers, and contractors to remain vigilant when assessing products that resemble ScreedBoard® in name or description

Cellecta is urging architects, developers, and contractors to remain vigilant when assessing products that resemble ScreedBoard® in name or description

By Lauren Holmes
July 17, 2025
974
0

Cellecta Ltd, the UK manufacturer of the trademark-registered ScreedBoard®, is urging construction professionals to exercise caution as imitation products and misleading terminology continue to appear across the market.

ScreedBoard® 28 is one of the UK industry’s leading high-density dry gypsum acoustic floor panel. Renowned for its outstanding performance, unique interlocking edge design, and third-party certifications, the panel helps a separating floor exceed Part E Building Regulations for acoustic performance typically by over 5dB. For over 18 years, it has been widely specified across residential and commercial developments for its proven compliance and consistent results.

“We are increasingly seeing companies use similar names, such as ‘screed board’ or ‘screed boarding’, in ways that can mislead specifiers and compromise the integrity of compliant builds,” said Ben Banks, Technical Director at Cellecta.

He added: “We are committed to protecting our brand and supporting specifiers in making informed, confident decisions that are backed by independent and comprehensive levels of testing. Where necessary, we will pursue legal remedies to address any misuse of our trademarks. We’ve seen developers forced to rip up and replace floors after post-completion testing exposed substandard acoustic performance from inferior alternatives. Any initial cost savings are quickly erased when remediation is required.”

Cellecta is also warning that some competitors are misrepresenting their products as Robust Detail (RD) compliant, despite lacking proper certification. Whilst these companies reference general floor types such as E-FC-1, E-FC-2, or E-FS-1. All of which require a 17dB impact improvement from an acoustic treatment, to show compliance with RD. It is important that this can be backed up by independent test data. It should also be made clear that these references do not equate to system-level approval, especially when proprietary components such as underfloor heating layers are introduced or the acoustic board is used in applications such as timber frame or steel joisted floors. Proprietary Robust Details must utilise the components shown in the RD, and these must not be substituted.

Literature should be clear on what application and exactly which Robust Detail their products are suitable for, remember unless the entire system is tested in accordance with the handbook, it is not suitable.

As part of its ongoing commitment to brand integrity, Cellecta enforces a strict policy of monitoring and defending its intellectual property. Legal action will be taken against any organisation using misleading or derivative variations of its trademarks that risk causing confusion or diluting the ScreedBoard® brand’s reputation.

More than just a product, ScreedBoard® is a legally protected brand and a proprietary Robust Detail solution. Backed by UKAS-accredited test data and supported with a minimum 10-year warranty, it delivers certified acoustic performance with complete peace of mind both with and without underfloor heating.

Cellecta encourages all specifiers to seek clarification where any doubt exists regarding a product’s authenticity, certification, or compliance. Asking the right questions up front can prevent costly issues later.

“We stand behind our product, our trademark, and our customers,” added Stephen Cain, Communications Manager at Cellecta. “We’ll continue working to ensure the industry has access to clearly certified, high-performance acoustic flooring solutions—without compromise.”

ScreedBoard® is a registered trademark of Cellecta Ltd (UK Trademark No. UK00002454165).

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook

Related

Previous Article

How People Will Want to Live in ...

Next Article

Safewall® — Your One‑Stop Certified Rainscreen Solution

Latest Issue



[Click Here to view the Low Res PDF version]

© Copyright Design Buy Build. All rights reserved.
 

Loading Comments...
 

    MH Media Global uses cookies to ensure the best user experience. If you do not wish to allow cookies, please click refuse.