Design Buy Build

Main Menu

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Rates & Data
    • Media Pack
  • Digital
    • Information
    • Latest Newsletter
  • Issues
    • 2022
      • Issue 57
      • Issue 56
      • Issue 55
      • Issue 54
    • 2021
      • Issue 53
      • Issue 52
      • Issue 51
      • Issue 50
      • Issue 49
      • Issue 48
    • 2020
      • Issue 47
      • Issue 46
      • Issue 45
      • Issue 44
      • Issue 43
      • Issue 42
    • 2019
      • Issue 41
      • Issue 40
      • Issue 39
      • Issue 38
      • Issue 37
      • Issue 36
    • 2018
      • Issue 35
      • Issue 34
      • Issue 33
      • Issue 32
      • Issue 31
      • Issue 30
    • 2017
      • Issue 29
      • Issue 28
      • Issue 27
      • Issue 26
      • Issue 25
      • Issue 24
    • 2016
      • Issue 23
      • Issue 22
      • Issue 21
      • Issue 20
      • Issue 19
      • Issue 18
    • 2015
      • Issue 17
      • Issue 16
      • Issue 15
      • Issue 14
      • Issue 13
      • Issue 12
    • 2014
      • Issue 11
      • Issue 10
      • Issue 9
      • Issue 8
      • Issue 7
    • 2013
      • Issue 6
      • Issue 5
      • Issue 4
      • Issue 3
      • Issue 2
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
Sign in / Join

Login

Welcome! Login in to your account
Lost your password?

Lost Password

Back to login

logo

Design Buy Build

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Rates & Data
    • Media Pack
  • Digital
    • Information
    • Latest Newsletter
  • Issues
    • 2022
      • Issue 57
      • Issue 56
      • Issue 55
      • Issue 54
    • 2021
      • Issue 53
      • Issue 52
      • Issue 51
      • Issue 50
      • Issue 49
      • Issue 48
    • 2020
      • Issue 47
      • Issue 46
      • Issue 45
      • Issue 44
      • Issue 43
      • Issue 42
    • 2019
      • Issue 41
      • Issue 40
      • Issue 39
      • Issue 38
      • Issue 37
      • Issue 36
    • 2018
      • Issue 35
      • Issue 34
      • Issue 33
      • Issue 32
      • Issue 31
      • Issue 30
    • 2017
      • Issue 29
      • Issue 28
      • Issue 27
      • Issue 26
      • Issue 25
      • Issue 24
    • 2016
      • Issue 23
      • Issue 22
      • Issue 21
      • Issue 20
      • Issue 19
      • Issue 18
    • 2015
      • Issue 17
      • Issue 16
      • Issue 15
      • Issue 14
      • Issue 13
      • Issue 12
    • 2014
      • Issue 11
      • Issue 10
      • Issue 9
      • Issue 8
      • Issue 7
    • 2013
      • Issue 6
      • Issue 5
      • Issue 4
      • Issue 3
      • Issue 2
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
Latest News
Home›Latest News›Growing number of builders risk cashflow problems and paying more tax as HMRC clamps down on accounting errors

Growing number of builders risk cashflow problems and paying more tax as HMRC clamps down on accounting errors

By Fiona Meadows
September 12, 2014
640
0
  • Over 2,300 builders had their self-employed status revoked by HMRC
  • Highest number since records began

A growing proportion of builders are at risk of cashflow problems and paying more tax as HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) clamps down on tax and accounting errors, according to data obtained by SJD Accountancy, the UK’s leading contractor services provider.The official figures show that in the most recent tax year 2,318 subcontractors in the construction industry had their ‘Gross Payment Status’ – their right to be paid without deductions made for tax – revoked by HMRC. This is the highest number since records began.

Over a quarter (28 per cent) of subcontractors who failed their annual review to ensure tax compliance lost their gross payment status, up from 22 per cent in 2012/13.

SJD Accountancy says that the loss of Gross Payment Status can be severely damaging for builders, potentially resulting in higher tax, reduced cashflow, breach of contract with contractors and reduced opportunities to tender for work.

Subcontractors can apply for Gross Payment Status under the Construction Industry Scheme (CIS) administered by HMRC. The advantages for subcontractors of being registered as self-employed, and therefore entitled to Gross Payment Status, include reduced NI contributions and the ability to offset legitimate business-related expenses against their tax liability at the end of each tax year.

Claire Johnson, Managing Director of SJD Accountancy, comments: “HMRC is becoming much stricter in how it audits the construction industry for compliance and nearly a third of builders who fail their annual review are now losing their right to be paid gross.”

“The impact on a builder from the loss of gross payment status can be very severe, including a higher tax bill, reduced cashflow and in some cases loss of business and the opportunity to tender for work.”

“Gross payment status can be withdrawn for relatively minor mistakes, such as filing a return a few days late or owing a relatively small amount of tax, even if late payment was due to a bad debt causing cashflow difficulties.”

She adds: “Fortunately, being fully compliant is quite straightforward and is usually simply a matter of being organised and keeping on top of deadlines. Often when a taxpayer fails to comply it is because they do not have an accountant and they do not keep track of deadlines due to other priorities.”

According to SJD Accountancy, subcontractors who lose their gross payment status for relatively minor mistakes can appeal the decision, but they will need to convince HMRC that the issue was an isolated error.

Claire Johnson adds: “HMRC is increasingly rigorous in how it views compliance in the construction sector. A relatively minor slip up, even if a genuine mistake, can result in gross payment status being withdrawn and builders having 20 per cent tax deducted from invoices.”

www.sjdaccountancy.com

logo

Previous Article

Sunscreen for your wood

Next Article

PanelGrip® – Balustrade Systems Made Simple!

Latest Issue



[Click Here to view the Low Res PDF version]

<center>
© Copyright Design Buy Build. All rights reserved.