Design Buy Build

Main Menu

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Rates & Data
    • Media Pack
  • Digital
    • Information
    • Latest Newsletter
  • Issues
    • 2025
      • Issue 75
      • Issue 74
      • Issue 73
      • Issue 72
    • 2024
      • Issue 71
      • Issue 70
      • Issue 69
      • Issue 68
      • Issue 67
      • Issue 66
    • 2023
      • Issue 65
      • Issue 64
      • Issue 63
      • Issue 62
      • Issue 61
      • Issue 60
    • 2022
      • Issue 59
      • Issue 58
      • Issue 57
      • Issue 56
      • Issue 55
      • Issue 54
    • 2021
      • Issue 53
      • Issue 52
      • Issue 51
      • Issue 50
      • Issue 49
      • Issue 48
    • 2020
      • Issue 47
      • Issue 46
      • Issue 45
      • Issue 44
      • Issue 43
      • Issue 42
    • 2019
      • Issue 41
      • Issue 40
      • Issue 39
      • Issue 38
      • Issue 37
      • Issue 36
    • 2018
      • Issue 35
      • Issue 34
      • Issue 33
      • Issue 32
      • Issue 31
      • Issue 30
    • 2017
      • Issue 29
      • Issue 28
      • Issue 27
      • Issue 26
      • Issue 25
      • Issue 24
    • 2016
      • Issue 23
      • Issue 22
      • Issue 21
      • Issue 20
      • Issue 19
      • Issue 18
    • 2015
      • Issue 17
      • Issue 16
      • Issue 15
      • Issue 14
      • Issue 13
      • Issue 12
    • 2014
      • Issue 11
      • Issue 10
      • Issue 9
      • Issue 8
      • Issue 7
    • 2013
      • Issue 6
      • Issue 5
      • Issue 4
      • Issue 3
      • Issue 2
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
Sign in / Join

Login

Welcome! Login in to your account
Lost your password?

Lost Password

Back to login

logo

Design Buy Build

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Rates & Data
    • Media Pack
  • Digital
    • Information
    • Latest Newsletter
  • Issues
    • 2025
      • Issue 75
      • Issue 74
      • Issue 73
      • Issue 72
    • 2024
      • Issue 71
      • Issue 70
      • Issue 69
      • Issue 68
      • Issue 67
      • Issue 66
    • 2023
      • Issue 65
      • Issue 64
      • Issue 63
      • Issue 62
      • Issue 61
      • Issue 60
    • 2022
      • Issue 59
      • Issue 58
      • Issue 57
      • Issue 56
      • Issue 55
      • Issue 54
    • 2021
      • Issue 53
      • Issue 52
      • Issue 51
      • Issue 50
      • Issue 49
      • Issue 48
    • 2020
      • Issue 47
      • Issue 46
      • Issue 45
      • Issue 44
      • Issue 43
      • Issue 42
    • 2019
      • Issue 41
      • Issue 40
      • Issue 39
      • Issue 38
      • Issue 37
      • Issue 36
    • 2018
      • Issue 35
      • Issue 34
      • Issue 33
      • Issue 32
      • Issue 31
      • Issue 30
    • 2017
      • Issue 29
      • Issue 28
      • Issue 27
      • Issue 26
      • Issue 25
      • Issue 24
    • 2016
      • Issue 23
      • Issue 22
      • Issue 21
      • Issue 20
      • Issue 19
      • Issue 18
    • 2015
      • Issue 17
      • Issue 16
      • Issue 15
      • Issue 14
      • Issue 13
      • Issue 12
    • 2014
      • Issue 11
      • Issue 10
      • Issue 9
      • Issue 8
      • Issue 7
    • 2013
      • Issue 6
      • Issue 5
      • Issue 4
      • Issue 3
      • Issue 2
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
DBB1215
Home›Newsletter›DBB1215›Stainless Steel – Ticking All The Boxes!

Stainless Steel – Ticking All The Boxes!

By Josh Holmes
December 7, 2015
1172
0

The increasing emphasis of design life value when specifying for commercial projects has prompted the development of metal façade and roofing systems of greater durability and lower maintenance. Despite its technical advantages, however, use of stainless steel has been held back by the perception that it is expensive.

Comparison of metal prices per tonne would certainly preclude selection for most projects but its enhanced strength means that thinner gauges present no compromise in strength. When comparing cost per square metre things therefore look very different.

To put this into perspective, a typical minimum façade thickness for aluminium and copper is 1mm compared to zinc at 0.8mm and stainless steel at just 0.5mm. Though roofing systems can be slightly thinner, a simple 300m2 area requiring around 1 tonne of stainless steel will still weigh 1.5 tonnes or more in zinc or copper (and more than 10 tonnes in lead)! For large projects such as the new £45m, 80,000 sq. ft. Marks and Spencer and Wagamama restaurant on Glasgow Fort retail park, UGINOX® 0.6mm stainless steel shingles specified by architects Cooper Cromar saved around 18 tonnes in façade weight. In terms of aesthetics, the highly smooth, polished 2K finish provides maximum resistance to accumulation of contaminants and was described by the architect as ‘an elegant stainless steel-clad box’. It undeniably forms a distinctive feature when approached from the motorway.

Among the many factors influencing use of metals in construction, the need for greater sustainability has been an undeniable driver of change. Stainless steel has been associated predominantly with highly polished finishes but the choice of visual effects now available includes linen, lozenge and chequer patterns in a palette of different colours and textures. Traditional bead and sand blasted options all show a level of detail which can only be achieved through use of advanced rolling techniques.

The desire to use colour and texture has never gone away and the growing use of stainless steel owes much to the introduction of these contemporary colours and finishes, the affordability of which is gradually becoming more widely appreciated. Where once there might have been little or no consideration of aesthetics there is now greater scope than ever before to put a personal stamp on design without adversely affecting performance.

The variety of colours and finishes in stainless steel is perhaps best illustrated by English Heritage’s endorsement of a material which, through natural patination, takes on the appearance of aged lead sheet. UGINOX® Patina provides scope for use as a standing seam or roll batten finish and has a low coefficient of expansion which enables tray lengths to be up to 20 metres. The thin gauge greatly reduces structural loading on centuries-old timbers, a 0.5mm system weighing 4kg/m2. While clearly wanting to encourage lead’s continued use on historic buildings, it was considered pragmatic to approve stainless steel because of its appearance, long design life and affordability. Where lead theft continues to be a risk or lack of funds / insurance preclude its use, stainless steel offers the vital balance between retention of the visual aesthetic and long term performance. Unlike lead, it is not susceptible to cold working fatigue and can be soldered at low temperatures. Just as importantly, it can be used in harsh environments.

Such developments are a world away from the highly polished finishes with which many specifiers still associate the metal. Dramatic façades such as that on the John Lewis Store and Cineplex in Leicester undoubtedly take the eye by reflecting colour and changing light. A 34,000m2 rain screen was commissioned in a mirror finish but to diffuse the large area into a series of smaller reflective surfaces the metal was ‘pleated’ at different scales. It is so smooth that the finish is virtually self-cleaning and the exterior ‘curtain’ concept has been taken into the outer fringes of the interior.

Stainless steel is being used in diverse projects ranging from self-builds to transport infrastructure. The new Galashiels interchange building has been much in the news following the long awaited re-opening of the Borders railway linking to Edinburgh. It has a durable matt façade in what was also designed as a ‘statement building’. Given the predisposition to consider stainless steel as uncompetitive against other metals, the most critical element in this particular project was that, by virtue of weight and gauge of material used, it saved more than £11/m2 over anodised aluminium.

Once installed, stainless steel presents no risk to potable water and will not stain masonry or timber. It is 100% recyclable so can be used to re-manufacture roofing, façade, rainscreen or rainwater products. An exceptionally high melting point gives high fire resistance, while the material’s tensile strength is twice that of copper and more than four times that of aluminium. For over 100 years, the metal’s high performance has prompted use in the most demanding industries and environments. Now, outstanding corrosion resistance and design life are prompting use of stainless steel in increasingly complex specifications. With demands for high end aesthetics and low maintenance, it is surely set to be specified for an increasingly high proportion of projects.

Aperam Stainless Services & Solutions UK Limited
9 Midland Way, Barlborough Links,
Barlborough, Derbyshire. S43 4XA
T: 01246 571660
E: kevin.jones@aperam.com
www.uginox.com

UGINOX

 

 

 

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook

Related

Previous Article

Excitement Builds For The January Furniture Show

Next Article

Is Secondary Ventilation Pipe Work Still Necessary ...

Latest Issue



[Click Here to view the Low Res PDF version]

<center>
© Copyright Design Buy Build. All rights reserved.
 

Loading Comments...
 

    MH Media Global uses cookies to ensure the best user experience. If you do not wish to allow cookies, please click refuse.